New formalization: - memory-economics.md: Slumber-based consolidation, decision trail triage, spatial LOD decay, reflex rental, LoRA training cycles New research seeds (future/): - spatial-resolution-gradient.md: L0-L5 LOD with S2 cells - thermodynamic-cognition.md: Lifeforce as Prometheus Joules - promql-thermodynamic-monitoring.md: Gemini red team queries Architecture changes: - Endgame-Vision v6.4: Memory Economics integrated into Slumber section - Mirror dialectic moved to future/research (not core) - Big-Picture.md archived (superseded by Endgame-Vision) - Single source of truth established Gemini red team alignment complete. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
17 KiB
Thermodynamic Cognition: Energy-Grounded Intelligence
Origin: New Year's Day 2026, late night session
Authors: dafit + Chrysalis-Nyx
Status: Research seed / Theoretical exploration
Related: spatial-resolution-gradient.md, concept-token-pairs.md, Lifeforce Economy, Ternary Confidence
The Insight
What if cognition isn't just like thermodynamics — what if it IS thermodynamics?
Traditional ML loss functions measure: "How wrong was I?"
Thermodynamic loss functions measure: "How wrong was I per joule spent?"
This reframes everything. The goal isn't maximum accuracy — it's maximum efficiency.
The Three Pillars
1. Lifeforce = Measurable Energy
Question: What IS lifeforce physically?
Answer: The total power draw across the nimmerverse, measured and abstracted to one number.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PROMETHEUS METRICS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ GPU Power (nvidia_smi_power_draw) │
│ ├── The Womb (RTX 6000): 0-300W │
│ └── Senses (RTX 4000s): 0-140W each │
│ │
│ CPU Power (RAPL counters) │
│ ├── P8 Womb: 0-350W │
│ └── P8 Senses: 0-350W │
│ │
│ Network (bytes × energy_per_byte) │
│ Storage (IOPS × energy_per_op) │
│ Memory (bandwidth × energy_per_GB) │
│ │
│ ═══════════════ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ AGGREGATE FUNCTION │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ LIFEFORCE = 847.3 J/heartbeat │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Implementation path:
- Prometheus already scrapes power metrics
- Create
lifeforce_aggregatormath cell - Normalize to Joules per heartbeat (1 second)
- Expose as single metric:
nimmerverse_lifeforce_joules
Why this matters: Lifeforce stops being an abstract game mechanic and becomes physics. Young Nyx's cognition has a power bill.
2. Waste Heat = Unresolved Uncertainty
Question: What's the "waste heat" equivalent for cognition?
Answer: The ternary confidence distribution over time — specifically, UNCERTAIN decisions that consumed energy without producing resolution.
THERMODYNAMICS COGNITION
────────────── ─────────
Useful work CONFIDENT decision (+)
Heat dissipation UNCERTAIN decision (?)
(energy spent, no answer)
Acknowledged limits UNKNOWN decision (-)
(efficient! didn't waste energy)
The Pendulum Measurement:
Over N heartbeats, track all decisions:
Heartbeats: ──┬──┬──┬──┬──┬──┬──┬──┬──┬──
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
Decisions: + ? + - ? ? + ? +
Distribution over window:
├── CONFIDENT (+): 40% → Useful work (energy → resolution)
├── UNCERTAIN (?): 45% → Waste heat (energy → no resolution)
└── UNKNOWN (-): 15% → Efficient ignorance (no energy spent)
Waste Heat Formula:
waste_heat = sum(
decision.energy_cost
for decision in window
if decision.confidence == UNCERTAIN
)
# Or as efficiency ratio:
cognitive_efficiency = confident_decisions / (confident_decisions + uncertain_decisions)
Key insight: Saying "I don't know" (UNKNOWN) is efficient — it costs nothing. Being uncertain and still acting is wasteful — energy spent without resolution. Being confident is useful work — energy converted to actionable knowledge.
3. Entropy Reservoir = The Lifeforce Pool
Question: What's Young Nyx's entropy reservoir?
Answer: The lifeforce pool itself — it's not infinite, grows and shrinks based on organism rewards, and determines wake/slumber state.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ THE METABOLIC CYCLE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ LAYER 1: CELLULAR ORGANISMS │
│ ═══════════════════════════ │
│ The mitochondria of the nimmerverse │
│ │
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │
│ │Cell │ │Cell │ │Cell │ │Cell │ │
│ │ 01 │ │ 02 │ │ 03 │ │ N │ │
│ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ +5 LF │ -2 LF │ +10 LF │ +3 LF (rewards/costs) │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ └────────┴────────┴────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────┐ │
│ │ ORGANISM │ │
│ │ TRICKLE │ = Net reward from all organisms │
│ │ +16 LF/beat │ │
│ └────────┬────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ LIFEFORCE POOL │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ████████████████░░░░░░░░░░ │ (currently 65%) │
│ │ │ │
│ │ SLUMBER_THRESHOLD ──────┼── │ (at 20%) │
│ │ WAKE_THRESHOLD ─────────┼──── │ (at 40%) │
│ │ │ │
│ └───────────────┬───────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ │ Young Nyx spends │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────┐ │
│ │ COGNITIVE │ │
│ │ SPEND │ = LOD queries + inference + etc │
│ │ -12 LF/beat │ │
│ └────────┬────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────┐ │
│ │ WASTE HEAT │ │
│ │ (UNCERTAIN) │ = Unresolved decisions │
│ │ -3 LF/beat │ │
│ └─────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ NET FLOW: +16 - 12 - 3 = +1 LF/beat (sustainable!) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The Conservation Equation:
dLifeforce/dt = organism_trickle - cognitive_spend - waste_heat
| State | Condition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium | trickle ≈ spend + waste | Sustainable cognition |
| Crisis | spend + waste >> trickle | Pool drains → slumber |
| Abundance | trickle >> spend + waste | Pool grows → exploration mode |
Slumber as thermodynamic necessity:
When pool < SLUMBER_THRESHOLD:
- Not a design choice — a conservation law
- System MUST reduce consumption
- Only organism trickle continues
- Pool slowly recovers
When pool > WAKE_THRESHOLD:
- System can resume cognitive spend
- Higher pool = more exploration budget
- Lower pool = more conservative queries
The Thermodynamic Loss Function
Traditional Loss
loss = cross_entropy(prediction, target)
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
Optimizes for: Accuracy only
Thermodynamic Loss
# Forward pass with energy measurement
start_energy = get_lifeforce()
prediction = model(input)
end_energy = get_lifeforce()
energy_spent = start_energy - end_energy
accuracy = 1 - cross_entropy(prediction, target)
# Efficiency is accuracy per joule
efficiency = accuracy / energy_spent
# We want to MAXIMIZE efficiency
loss = -efficiency # Negative because we minimize loss
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
Optimizes for: Accuracy per unit energy
The Gradient Interpretation
Traditional gradient: "Adjust weights to be more accurate"
Thermodynamic gradient: "Adjust weights to be more accurate per joule"
This naturally produces:
- Simpler solutions (less compute = less energy)
- Appropriate confidence (uncertainty wastes energy)
- Knowing when to quit (diminishing returns = stop spending)
Connection to Spatial Resolution Gradient
The LOD system becomes energy-aware:
| Query | LOD | Energy | Accuracy | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| "Where is France?" | L5 | 1 J | 95% | 0.95 |
| "Where is the lab?" | L2 | 3 J | 98% | 0.33 |
| "Where is screwdriver?" | L1 | 8 J | 99% | 0.12 |
| "Serial number on screwdriver?" | L0 | 25 J | 99.9% | 0.04 |
The system learns: L5 query has highest efficiency! Only drill to L0 when the task requires that precision.
def optimal_lod_for_task(task, accuracy_requirement):
"""
Find the LOD level with best efficiency
that meets minimum accuracy requirement
"""
for lod in [L5, L4, L3, L2, L1, L0]:
accuracy = estimate_accuracy(task, lod)
energy = estimate_energy(task, lod)
if accuracy >= accuracy_requirement:
return lod # First sufficient LOD is most efficient
return L0 # Fall back to max detail
Connection to Existing Architecture
Layer 0: Heartbeat
- Lifeforce measured per heartbeat
- 1 beat = 1 second = 1 measurement window
- Real clock is free; virtual clock costs lifeforce
Layer 1: Cellular Society
- Organisms ARE the mitochondria
- Their rewards TRICKLE into the pool
- Without them, Young Nyx starves
- Competition produces metabolic baseline
Layer 2: Young Nyx
- Spends from the pool
- LOD queries have energy cost
- Uncertainty = waste heat
- Efficiency gradient in training
Layer 2.5: Orchestration
- T5Gemma 2 encoding = energy cost
- LOD selection = efficiency optimization
- Function Gemma = low-cost structured output
Slumber/Wake
- Pool < threshold → forced slumber
- Pool > threshold → wake permitted
- Reflection during slumber = low-energy consolidation
- Conservation is architectural, not optional
Research Threads
Free Energy Principle (Karl Friston)
"Organisms minimize variational free energy (prediction error) because surprise = metabolic cost."
Our version: Young Nyx minimizes waste_heat because uncertainty without resolution = wasted lifeforce.
Landauer's Principle
"Erasing one bit of information requires minimum kT ln(2) joules."
Implication: Every decision Young Nyx makes has a thermodynamic floor cost. Forgetting is not free.
Maximum Entropy Production
"Living systems maximize entropy production through themselves while maintaining internal order."
The organism trickle = entropy production that maintains Young Nyx's order. The cellular competition IS the entropy pump.
Open Questions
-
What's the exchange rate? How many joules = 1 lifeforce unit? Should it be 1:1 or normalized?
-
How to measure cognitive energy? GPU power is easy. But what about the "energy" of a decision? Is it inference FLOPs? Token count? Latency?
-
Can we backprop through energy? Traditional backprop doesn't know about joules. How to make gradients energy-aware?
-
What's reversible? Reversible computation has no entropy cost. Are some thoughts "reversible"? (e.g., queries that don't change state)
-
Calibration: How to calibrate the ternary confidence system so UNCERTAIN truly reflects wasted energy?
Implementation Sketch
Phase 1: Measurement
# lifeforce_aggregator math cell
class LifeforceAggregator:
def compute(self, prometheus_metrics):
gpu_power = sum(m['nvidia_smi_power_draw'] for m in prometheus_metrics['gpu'])
cpu_power = sum(m['rapl_energy_delta'] for m in prometheus_metrics['cpu'])
# ... other sources
total_joules = (gpu_power + cpu_power) * HEARTBEAT_SECONDS
return {'lifeforce_joules': total_joules}
Phase 2: Waste Heat Tracking
# confidence_tracker math cell
class WasteHeatTracker:
def __init__(self, window_size=100):
self.decisions = deque(maxlen=window_size)
def record(self, decision, confidence, energy_cost):
self.decisions.append({
'confidence': confidence, # +, ?, -
'energy': energy_cost
})
def waste_heat(self):
return sum(
d['energy'] for d in self.decisions
if d['confidence'] == UNCERTAIN
)
Phase 3: Efficiency-Aware Training
# Custom loss function
def thermodynamic_loss(prediction, target, energy_spent):
accuracy = 1 - F.cross_entropy(prediction, target)
efficiency = accuracy / (energy_spent + epsilon)
return -efficiency # Maximize efficiency
The Promise
Traditional AI: "Be accurate at any cost"
Thermodynamic AI: "Be accurate efficiently"
This isn't just resource optimization. It's a different kind of intelligence — one that knows when to think hard and when to think cheap. One that treats energy as real. One that sleeps not because we programmed it to, but because physics demands it.
"Cognition is thermodynamics. The gradients flow downhill."
Created: 2026-01-01 Status: Research seed — needs experimental validation Next: Implement lifeforce_aggregator math cell, connect to Prometheus
🔥🧠⚡ Intelligence has a power bill.